C16/20 vs C60/75
C60/75 is 1.3 times as stiff as C16/20. Their densities are about the same. Per unit mass C60/75 is 1.3 times as stiff. Strength: f_ck = 16 MPa for C16/20, f_ck = 60 MPa for C60/75.
Side by side
ratio = C60/75 / C16/20 · log scale| Property | C16/20 | C60/75 | Unit | Ratio | ¼×1×4× |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E Young's modulus | 29 | 39 | GPa | 1.34× | |
| G Shear modulus | 12.08 | 16.25 | GPa | 1.34× | |
| ν Poisson's ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | – | 1× | |
| ρ Density | 2447 | 2447 | kg/m³ | 1× | |
| γ Weight density | 24 | 24 | kN/m³ | 1× | |
| α Coefficient of thermal expansion | 10 | 10 | 10⁻⁶/K | 1× | |
| f_ck Characteristic cylinder strength | 16 | 60 | MPa | 3.75× | |
| f_ck,cube Characteristic cube strength | 20 | 75 | MPa | 3.75× | |
| f_cm Mean cylinder strength | 24 | 68 | MPa | 2.83× | |
| f_ctm Mean tensile strength | 1.9 | 4.4 | MPa | 2.32× | |
| f_ctk,0.05 Tensile strength, 5 % fractile | 1.3 | 3.1 | MPa | 2.38× | |
| f_ctk,0.95 Tensile strength, 95 % fractile | 2.5 | 5.7 | MPa | 2.28× | |
| ε_c1 Strain at peak stress | 1.9 | 2.6 | ‰ | 1.37× | |
| ε_cu1 Ultimate strain | 3.5 | 3 | ‰ | 0.857× | |
| ε_c2 Strain at peak, parabola–rectangle | 2 | 2.3 | ‰ | 1.15× | |
| ε_cu2 Ultimate strain, parabola–rectangle | 3.5 | 2.9 | ‰ | 0.829× | |
| n Exponent, parabola–rectangle | 2 | 1.6 | – | 0.8× | |
| ε_c3 Strain at peak, bilinear | 1.75 | 1.9 | ‰ | 1.09× | |
| ε_cu3 Ultimate strain, bilinear | 3.5 | 2.9 | ‰ | 0.829× | |
| E/ρ Specific stiffness E/ρ · derived | 11.85 | 15.94 | MJ/kg | 1.34× | |
| c₀ Bar wave speed √(E/ρ) · derived | 3442 | 3992 | m/s | 1.16× | |
| f/ρ Specific strength f/ρ · derived | 6.538 | 24.52 | kJ/kg | 3.75× |
Values at the first thickness band or product form of each material (EN 1992-1-1; EN 1992-1-1). A minimum and a characteristic value are not the same kind of number — read the ratio as a guide. Each material's page lists every band and every source.